Outsider Art has been getting a
lot of coverage in Philadelphia over the past
few months with exhibitions at the Philadelphia Museum of Art and smaller
events such as Interconnection: The Art
of Social Change at the Asian Arts Initiative, and Beyond Boundaries at Magic
Gardens . Having attended
the majority of these exhibits, I began to wonder if labeling the work as "outsider" helps or harms the integrity of artists. I recently showed an acquaintance one
of the drawings that caught my eye, providing no information about the artist
or the venue. He responded, “I’d say it was genius if it were drawn by a 4
year old.” Granted, this person was intoxicated, but he spoke honestly
regarding his opinion of work. This brief conversation provoked me to
investigate two things: what the difference is between an artist on the inside
and one the outside, and what makes a preschooler a genius.
Artists have been defined as
those who are able, by virtue of imagination and talent
or skill, to create works of aesthetic value,
especially in the fine arts, while outsider artists are defined
as untutored, working by themselves, for
themselves, without recognizing themselves as artists.
On the surface, the differences
between insiders and outsiders are not in the quality of the work, but the
recognition and respect gained from others who see their work. By definition,
outsiders are viewed as ignorant isolationists, unaware that they possess the
same skills and talents of artists celebrated by the public. The differences
become apparent when one’s focus shifts to the “aesthetic value” of the work,
questioning what determines how much the work is worth. An artist in isolation may be less aware of
their work’s value because others are not present to attribute value to work
and the artist. Having others acknowledging the value in one’s work often
creates a sense of self-importance in the artist, and pressure to produce work
worthy of the praise and labels like “genius” bestowed upon them. Therefore,
it’s not the work that makes an artist a genius, but the viewer’s expectations
of what the artist should make. The hypothetical four-year-old mentioned
earlier is not expected to produce representational drawings with anatomically
correct figures or accurate perspective, but adults exhibiting in public spaces
are expected to achieve this, or consciously challenge these practices with
strong visual arguments.
New Years 2008
The expectations we carry when
viewing exhibited work determines whether or not it is labeled (insider) art or
outsider art; therefore, individuals lacking academic training or recognition
from others, who make challenging work, could be categorized as geniuses.
Again, these expectations, not the work, are what form opinions of art and
determine the artist’s label. Exhibits like Beyond
Boundaries, showcasing the drawings and
paintings by artists from Oasis and PDDC
Cultural Arts
Center (Philadelphia Developmental
Disabilities Corporation) Art
Centers , fall under the
label of “outsider art”. While viewing the work on opening night, I noticed
strong narrative qualities -- what some might call brilliance -- from Alonzo
Troy Humphreys, Andrea Budu, and John Hoggan. Andrea Budu’s My Friends and New Years 1998
possess a reoccurring theme of overwhelming crowds in which figures are
drowning in pools of pigment. Badu’s New
Years contains a vacant street seen behind the crowd, which also serves as
a spotlight on a green central figure whose significance is unknown.
Guitar Players
Located beside Budu’s work are
the drawings of John Hoggan, entitled Guitar
Players and Collection. Hoggan
seems to have found a way to illustrate complete stories with just a few simple
lines. His long-legged stick figures serve as springboards for viewers to write
their own versions of Pitchfork documentaries about the best bands that never
played.
Peckin’ On Seed
Of all the work at Magic Gardens ,
Peckin on Seed makes the strongest
argument against the practice of labeling some artists as outsiders. Humphrey’s
understanding of composition and color theory imply that academic training and
self-awareness of ones artistic abilities may not be required to produce images
comparable to fine art. Furthermore, Peckin’s ability to prompt viewers to
ask questions about the work and the artist, keeping their attention on the
work rather than what someone else said about it, are what makes it valuable.
We can only speculate what inspired Dubu, Hoggan, and
Humphrey to draw and paint. The complete stories behind their art may remain a
mystery, but so would anyone’s inspiration for creating without talking
directly to them. What can be determined
from viewing the show are their abilities, by virtue of imagination and talent or skill, to
create works of aesthetic value. Whether or not they consider themselves
artists is not of any importance when one’s attention questions the shadows
cast by the right talon on a stump, or the mysterious source of light that also
serves as a street, or the mischievous winking eyes of a singing stick
figure. These individuals have created
work beyond the implied boundaries set by others through labels like “outsider”,
and deserve to be recognized simply as artists.
Beyond Boundaries is
currently on display at Magic
Gardens through April 14th,
2013, located at 1020 South Street .
Shawn Beeks
No comments:
Post a Comment